Can you actually make a dwelling by merely tweeting your ideas on the newest scorching matters?
That’s why your trusted companions at Yaccarino and Musk try to recommend, with a spread of high-profile Twitter customers this week sharing their big payouts from the primary spherical of Twitter’s advert income share program, which permits creators to revenue from adverts proven (to verified customers) inside their tweet replies.
Certainly, some tweeters have generated 5, even six determine sums from this system – however earlier than you go quitting your day job to begin crafting intelligent tweets, it’s value noting that there are some pretty important provisos in Twitter’s new incentive scheme.
First off, Twitter’s advert income share program is only available to Twitter Blue subscribers, so it’s a must to pay $8 a month to be eligible within the first place. Which is clearly not a major barrier, particularly once you’re going to be taking in 1000’s out of your tweets, whilst you additionally want a Stripe account, at current, to facilitate fee.
Simple thus far, now right here comes the harder factor – you additionally have to common 5m tweet impressions monthly over a three-month span, a minimum of.

That’s quite a bit. Most customers aren’t seeing anyplace near that degree of response, which considerably limits who can truly monetize their content material.
There’s additionally then a query of scale, and the viability of Twitter delivering huge payouts from this system ongoing. For this primary fee, Twitter proprietor Elon Musk says that the full sum being paid equates to $5 million, overlaying a five-month interval again to February, when he first introduced the income share scheme.
In a couple of weeks, X/Twitter will begin paying creators for adverts served of their replies. First block fee totals $5M.
Word, the creator should be verified and solely adverts served to verified customers depend.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 9, 2023
So whereas these preliminary funds are excessive, you truly have to divide every by 5 to get the month-to-month fee totals, with the block fee giving an inflated view of what you possibly can anticipate.
To get some perspective on what kind of fee you actually would possibly see, it is advisable to break down the numbers a bit additional.
Trying on the payouts which were reported via tweet, with many program contributors sharing their figures, greater than 9% of the full $5 million payout has gone to only 40 creators. As famous, a few of these creators have reported getting $20k, $25k, even $100k within the case of @InterenetHOF (which reposts fashionable content material from throughout the net). However even taking all of those huge funds into consideration, the typical payout amongst these high-engagement profiles is $2,275 monthly. Take out the highest 4 earners within the record, and that drops to $1,500 a month – so whereas the large numbers being shared could also be dazzling, you’re unlikely to have the ability to stop your day job primarily based on this program alone.
Which, in fact, Twitter’s not saying that you may – that is one part of its broader creator monetization push, which additionally contains subscriptions, and extra to come back. However it’s value noting that the truth of producing revenue from adverts in tweet replies could be very, impossible to see you pulling in $100k funds, as some have on this first set.
As The Washington Post has additionally reported, most of the high earners so far have additionally been right-leaning political commentators – which is sensible, as these are the customers which are signing as much as Twitter Blue, whereas a variety of the large winners are additionally aligned to Elon himself, together with a spread of Tesla fan accounts.
Because of this, some have urged that that is simply Elon paying his associates, and with out transparency, we’ve got no means of realizing the complete workings of the method. However Twitter maintains that this system is open to all who meet the acknowledged necessities, and dwell in a area the place Twitter funds can be found.
Certainly, Twitter has additionally been utilizing these huge preliminary payouts as a lure for extra creators, by sending out this notification to different huge accounts.

Word the usage of ‘may’ within the first sentence – as we reported final week, the delayed funds, main to greater totals, and the timing of the discharge has made this the right counter to the sudden consideration that Meta’s Threads app is getting, by exhibiting customers that they might truly make cash from their tweets, and massive cash at that, in the event that they stick with Twitter as an alternative.
However ‘may’ is essential. Many huge accounts weren’t eligible for this system, even a few of those who met the excessive engagement markers, although Twitter has additionally famous that it’s increasing eligibility quickly.
The subsequent query, then, is long-term viability. With Twitter’s advert income still down by 50% year-over-year, that leaves a slimmer pool to attract from for creator income share, which implies that as extra folks enroll, it’ll get even tougher for Twitter to maintain providing the identical ranges of payouts, except it could actually lure extra advert companions. At some stage, that may also come to a head, and if Twitter can’t carry in additional advert income, you possibly can guess that the creator reduce from adverts in replies shall be decreased, diluting the quantities paid to all creators.
That’s the subsequent huge danger. Snapchat, for instance, suffered important backlash after extra creators sought to participate in its Highlight rewards program, which noticed creators allotted a share of a static fund primarily based on the efficiency of their clips.
As extra creators signed up, the fee totals shrunk – so whereas creators have been truly producing extra engagement over time, the cash they noticed, in consequence, was declining every cycle.
If Twitter’s pressured to cut back its fee quantities, you possibly can anticipate to see comparable response, particularly as creators turn out to be extra reliant on that revenue.
Primarily, it’s very early days for this system as but, and if Twitter can’t get extra advert {dollars} coming in, it’s arduous to see how this program scales accordingly, as extra customers search to spice up their Twitter engagement for a share of the money.
And except you’re seeing, or are more likely to see thousands and thousands of tweet impressions monthly, it could not even value signing up – and even then, with a median payout of $350 per week for the highest most energetic accounts, the quantity of effort and time that you just’ll have to put in to achieve these numbers will not be value it, particularly as Twitter seems to crack down on those that simply reshare popular content from across the web.
The tip consequence, as I see it, shall be much more folks posting much more incendiary tweets, within the hopes of sparking extra engagement. Anger is the emotion that sparks the most comments on web content, and as such, that’s possible how customers are going to look to discover a means into this program.
Extra divisive content material is conversely unlikely to draw extra advert spend. And if advertisers don’t need their adverts to seem in reply threads, that reduces the quantity of income to share – so it will not be the gold mine that these huge early payouts recommend.
However wait, there’s extra – Elon has additionally stated that, quickly, the payouts from Twitter’s advert income share will ‘roughly double’ after they add in share from profile web page views as properly.
As promised.
Quickly, we are going to share advert income from profile web page views, which ought to roughly double payouts.
Word, solely views from verified customers depend, as it’s in any other case trivial to bot rip-off the view depend.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 16, 2023
I’m unsure how correct that estimation is, as most customers spend nearly all of their Twitter time in the principle feed. However it provides one other consideration to the combination, which may assist to lure extra creators.